On May 1 this year there will be the central gathering of NPD and camaraderie in Hamburg-Barmbek. However, it is left then of course counter-actions and a call the "autonomous antifascist groups Hamburg", which is far from all, what could be called criticism. In such an event feels the Left robbed in Hamburg, one of them babbling that the May 1 " us' and belonged to their own tradition feel deprived. Instead of understanding that there is no monopoly on anti-capitalism left subjected to any criticism and analysis in the trash (if you ever had something like that). The movement and action fetish caught trying in the post-Nazi society seriously for the umpteenth time, a "broad anti-fascist awareness create . You write Sätzt like "The May 1 is an international day of the tradition of the left Arbeiter_innenbewegung. "and does not understand so that in Germany too sometimes a tradition of Nazi German-national and anti-capitalism in conjunction with a German labor is madness. Maybe you think you are so much in the tradition of German Communists, it became impossible precisely because the content overlaps a ädequate criticism formulated. This one has no conception of anti-Semitism, here is one also in the best tradition, reveals itself then in the attempt to explain the "national community": " is thus assumed that all this would have a member of a common interest. In contrast to those inside become "enemies of the people" said, which will subordinate this world view or can not. "
can hardly shocking then the title of the anti-fascist counter-mobilization " International solidarity instead of national community! . Maybe this is just a search for the right alliance partners in order to Ebster Hamburg - Barmbek tradition on the left "main enemy", the anti-German bashing. For exactly this organization felt circle at that time by Israel in solidarity Antifas " provoked" and glorified the Antisemit_innen in the ranks of victims of this "provocation .
absolute mental collapse suffered by the caller, when they get out on the basis of their "Nazis!-Gepöbel, talk seriously about it, " that the Nazis either in Hamburg or anywhere else in the street are . It remains with the Golden Lemon answer: "What should the Nazis out of Germany? What would the für'n sense? The Nazis can still net 'Nau! For here belong 's gone! "
This can then only the Autonomous Anti-Fascist groups Hamburg himself cited and their slogan will be turned against them, because they are really" to the dustbin of history .
least there are bright spots in the dark, for in the 0408 edition of the transmitter , The booklet for the outdoor channel Kobminat , there was a focal point for the May 1, also appeared in the following article. This makes it clear where criticism could begin on May 1st. To expect that the autonomous Antifas read this at all, and then perform a reflection does, of course, no one.
Front and anti-capitalism
"Another world is possible", a world in which the social misery of the people - as a typical feature of capitalism - has an end and ensure a socialist economy, social conditions. On the day of 1 May 2008, demonstrated that - from the NPD, the young nationalists, and, one might add, really well from all the major and minor left-wing groups. Did the Nazis have taken over again the only promising left issues and strategies by watching, as well as the (more or less) distinguishing aesthetic wieschwarze hoodies and sunglasses? The wolf has eaten chalk to draw by social demagogy Verlierer_ the inside of the turbo-capitalism in the catch, where they discover too late that the Nazis or anti-capitalist, nor social, but are national?In view of the recurring discussions grasshopper and the concentration of many anti-fascists to pure anti-Nazi activism we consider it essential to recognize the anti-capitalism of the Nazis as such rather than to insist that the Left would have leased the real critique of capitalism by definition of its own. In our view distinguish the diffuse discomfort with the manifestations of modern capitalism from a radical critique of political economy, especially in the provision of work and money and interest, or, in other words, the separation of fact related processes. While the view of the Nazis (and, unfortunately, many so-called linker) but the custom work humans guarantees its right to exist, the Kapitalist_innen who ask this are demonized. Just as no one has something against all the Were objections that surround us, but more so for money and interest, which are then blamed for the misery. Labor, goods and money are not just recognized as an expression of social relations, which is not as easy as it (Fetish) character that fact and avoid them as quasi-can seem natural.
goods caused by those generated by work, and they can only realize their value in exchange. In the commodity form that is a social relation is mentioned: on the one hand, workers who can live on nothing other than selling their labor power, because they have no means of production. For their work, receive less back, as this is worth, or would the other side, the Produktionsmittelbesitzer_innen, no motivation to make their resources available. In the commodity is expressed not only just from the production process, but the entire social relationship, is produced in the. So have some funds that can be produced which, some do not. This social dimension is seen in the product but difficult. A commodity appears divided as a practical daily use (although many products do not appear particularly useful or practical) and cash-like than its price. Difficult because it is more likely to provide a general critique of the commonplace object, crystallizes the discomfort with the social conditions in the money, this is apparently the abstract expression of the whole misery. In this view, creating real work only money that is merely indicates the general equivalent and contained in the products work value. Money itself will not be a commodity, which follows, like other goods also, the mechanisms of supply and demand. To prevent that money is a commodity, speculated with and that can be accumulated, were already more people like Silvio Gsell, Pierre Proudhon, or the association focus Altona eV, which is a Altonaer local money - the Alto - out there, the idea , precisely to prevent and so the evil side of capitalism to a trick. Thus, the continuous depreciation of the Altos ensures "that the ALTO flows, that is passed on and not be hoarded. Shall serve from the Alto to the lively exchange of goods and services and not the accumulation of money through speculation and interest. "Money is more than just a medium of exchange, but rather the product, a social relationship.
If money is loaned, while its potential ability to make a profit selling. The price of the loan, the interest rate. Without the possibility of borrowing it would be impossible for most Kapitalist_innen to build new factories, for example. Interest is then paid out of profit, which by the Vernutzung of work force (Production of surplus value) is created. He is a property of capital, which can generate over the recovery process more capital. On the surface this appears as a sudden increase of money, which Marx described as the fetischartigste form of capital. The relationship between interest rate and capital ratio will disappear completely, compared with the rate of productive work. Income from interest is considered immoral, because it does not on its own "performance" based. A good amount of envy for this seemingly easy money generated may also partly explain the irrational hatred that just the better-known players in the financial capital hits. Especially if they are not in Germany have established and drink away their profits in foreign Nobel Hotel. A growing economy needs
financing through loans. Growth seen in both as well as the right-left Kapitalismuskritiker_innen unnaturally, they want a circuit like business as defined in (national) spaces, which correspond to the natural course of things. This often brings criticism goes to luxury goods and decadent lifestyle, which were responsible for an unjust distribution. But neither that social ownership is critical, it is just at the right hand a critique of competition and entrepreneurship,
culled of the fittest and the best guarantee and so processor to the national body.From such an analysis of capitalist realities, the attempted between the good, productive work and entrepreneurship and the abstract and seemingly superfluous side of money and interest to separate them, also results in a critique of the state which is not, but usually only criticism of how the state behaves in certain areas. Thus, the right call, given the closure of the Bochum Nokia plant to build a national mobile phone company, while the more left wing the repayment of subsidies and the receipt of the request operation.
We must refuse to be an anti-capitalism, which is in Resentment against those phenomena of modern society that are perceived as threatening exhausted and tries to grab certain phenomena of capitalist socialization out of context and to abolish or to condemn. Who evaluated these approaches on the part of the Nazis as not serious, purely strategic discussion uncovered by this defensive defensiveness only the indignation to a radical critique of this society, which offers a more sensible alternative, as the capital for the benefit of the people-volume "(calling the NPD May 1), or face after the scandals Liechtenstein'schen with banners pre
German Federal Chancellery, as the "Stop the robber barons: Sanctions against Liechtenstein demand (attacking).source: http://riotpropa.blogsport.de/
0 comments:
Post a Comment